It was a Tupperware tub of stay baby rats that made Dr Jessica Pierce begin to question the thought of pet possession. While pets remain property within the UK, the Animal Welfare Act of 2006 stipulates that pet house owners should present a fundamental level of care for their animals. In 2001, Rhode Island modified its laws to describe pet homeowners as guardians” , a move that some animal rights’ advocates lauded (and others criticised for being nothing more than a change in identify).
Although Pierce and Francione agree that pet ownership is incorrect, both of them have pets: Pierce has two dogs and a cat; Francione has six rescue canines, whom he considers refugees”. For now, the argument over whether or not we must always own animals is basically theoretical: we do have pets and giving them up may cause more harm than good.
Pets are additionally property in the US, but 32 states, in addition to Puerto Rico and Washington DC, now embody provisions for pets below home violence protection orders. Moreover, as Francione suggests, caring for pets appears to many individuals to be the one space the place we will actually do right by animals; convincing individuals of the opposite is a tough promote.
While pets remain property in the UK, the Animal Welfare Act of 2006 stipulates that pet owners should provide a basic level of care for their animals. In 2001, Rhode Island modified its laws to describe pet homeowners as guardians” , a move that some animal rights’ advocates lauded (and others criticised for being nothing more than a change in name).
Although Pierce and Francione agree that pet possession is fallacious, both of them have pets: Pierce has two dogs and a cat; Francione has six rescue canine, whom he considers refugees”. For now, the argument over whether we must always own animals is essentially theoretical: we do have pets and giving them up may trigger extra harm than good.